The reading passage explores the issue of xx. The professor's lecture deals with the same issue.
However, she thinks that XX, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she
uses three specific points to support her idea.
To begin with, even though the reading passage suggests that xx, the professor argues in
the lecture that xx. This is because XX, which means xx. Obviously, the professor's argument
disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Secondly, despite the statement in the reading that xx, the professor contends that xx.
Then he supports this point of view with the fact that xx.
Finally, the professor asserts that xx, where the reading claims that xx. The professor proves
his idea is indefensible by pointing out that xx.