The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that. Several reasons are offered
in support of this argument. First of all, the author points out that.
In addition, the author reasons that(What's more, he also assumes that)
At first glance, the author's argument appears to be somewhat convincing,
but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and
the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to
justify the conclusion. A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.
To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for
the author to claim that. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author
would have to show that. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author should
provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that.
Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.
Firstly, the author is engaged in.After this, therefore, because of this reasoning.
The line of reasoning is that because A happened before B, the former caused the latter.
However, this reasoning is fallacious unless other possible causal factors have been considered
and ruled out. For example, perhaps C. As a result, any decision aimed at addressing
the problem of B must be based on a more thorough investigation to gather data in order
to narrow down and locate the actual cause of B.