tofel

贡献者:游客10636678 类别:英文 时间:2016-11-02 22:12:56 收藏数:12 评分:0
返回上页 举报此文章
请选择举报理由:




收藏到我的文章 改错字
Although we now tend to refer to the various crafts according to the materials used to construct
them-clay
, glass, wood, fiber, and metal-it was once common to think of crafts in terms of function,
which led to their being known as the "applied arts." Approaching crafts from the point of view
of function
, we can divide them into simple categories: containers, shelters and supports. There is no way
around
the fact that containers, shelters, and supports must be functional. The applied arts are
thus bound by the
laws of physics, which pertain to both the materials used in their making and the substances
and things to
be contained, supported, and sheltered. These laws are universal in their application,
regardless of cultural beliefs, geography, or climate. If a pot has no bottom or has large openings
in its
sides, it could hardly be considered a container in any traditional sense. Since the laws of
physics
, not
some arbitrary decision, have determined the general form of applied-art objects, they follow basic
patterns,
so much so that functional forms can vary only within certain limits. Buildings without roofs,
for example, are unusual because they depart from the norm. However, not all functional objects are
exactly alike; that is why we recognize a Shang Dynasty vase as being different from an Inca vase.
What varies is not the basic form but the incidental details that do not obstruct the object's
primary
function.
Sensitivity to physical laws is thus an important consideration for the maker of applied-art
objects.
It is often taken for granted that this is also true for the maker of fine-art objects. This
assumption
misses a significant difference between the two disciplines. Fine-art objects are not
constrained by
the laws of physics in the same way that applied-art objects are. Because their
primary purpose is
not functional, they are only limited in terms of the materials used to make them.
Sculptures must,
for example, be stable, which requires an understanding of the properties of mass,
weight distribution,
and stress. Paintings must have rigid stretchers so that the canvas will be taut, and
the paint must not
deteriorate, crack, or discolor. These are problems that must be overcome by the artist
because they
tend to intrude upon his or her conception of the work. For example, in the early
Italian Renaissance,
bronze statues of horses with a raised foreleg usually had a cannonball under that hoof.
This was done
because the cannonball was needed to support the weight of the leg. In other words, the demands
of the laws of physics, not the sculptor's aesthetic intentions, placed the ball there.
That this device
was a necessary structural compromise is clear from the fact that the cannonball quickly disappeared
when sculptors learned how to strengthen the internal structure of a statue
with iron braces (iron being
much stronger than bronze).
声明:以上文章均为用户自行添加,仅供打字交流使用,不代表本站观点,本站不承担任何法律责任,特此声明!如果有侵犯到您的权利,请及时联系我们删除。
文章热度:
文章难度:
文章质量:
说明:系统根据文章的热度、难度、质量自动认证,已认证的文章将参与打字排名!

本文打字排名TOP20

登录后可见

用户更多文章推荐