新概念英语4 L32 Galileo reborn
In his own lifetime Galileo was the centre of violent controversy; but the scientific dust has
long since settled, and today we can see even his famous clash with the Inquisition in something
like its proper perspective. But, in contrast, it is only in modern times that Galileo has become
a problem child for historians of science. The old view of Galileo was delightfully uncomplicated.
He was, above all, a man who experimented: who despised the prejudices and book learning of the
Aristotelians, who put his questions to nature instead of to the ancients, and who drew his
conclusions fearlessly. He had been the first to turn a telescope to the sky, and he had seen their
evidence enough to overthrow Aristotle and Ptolemy together. He was the man who climbed the Leaning
Tower of Pisa and dropped various weights from the top, who rolled balls down inclined planes, and
then generalized the results of his many experiments into the famous law of free fall.
But a closer study of the evidence, supported by a deeper sense of the period, and particularly by
a new consciousness of the philosophical undercurrents in the scientific revolution, has profoundly
modified this view of Galileo. Today, although the old Galileo lives on in many popular writings,
among historians of science a new and more sophisticated picture has emerged. At the same time our
sympathy for Galileo's opponents has grown somewhat. His telescopic observations are justly
immortal; they aroused great interest at the time, they had important theoretical consequences,
and they provided a striking demonstration of the potentialities hidden in instruments and
apparatus. But can we blame those who looked and failed to see what Galileo saw, if we remember
that to use a telescope at the limit of its powers calls for long experience and intimate
familiarity with one's instrument? Was the philosopher who refused to look through Galileo's
telescope more culpable than those who alleged that the spiral nebulae observed with Lord Rosse's
great telescope in the 1840s were scratches left by the grinder? We can perhaps forgive those who
said the moons of Jupiter were produced by Galileo's spyglass if we recall that in his day, as for
centuries before, curved glass was the popular contrivance for producing not truth but illusion,
untruth; and if a single curved glass would distort nature, how much more would a pair of them?
long since settled, and today we can see even his famous clash with the Inquisition in something
like its proper perspective. But, in contrast, it is only in modern times that Galileo has become
a problem child for historians of science. The old view of Galileo was delightfully uncomplicated.
He was, above all, a man who experimented: who despised the prejudices and book learning of the
Aristotelians, who put his questions to nature instead of to the ancients, and who drew his
conclusions fearlessly. He had been the first to turn a telescope to the sky, and he had seen their
evidence enough to overthrow Aristotle and Ptolemy together. He was the man who climbed the Leaning
Tower of Pisa and dropped various weights from the top, who rolled balls down inclined planes, and
then generalized the results of his many experiments into the famous law of free fall.
But a closer study of the evidence, supported by a deeper sense of the period, and particularly by
a new consciousness of the philosophical undercurrents in the scientific revolution, has profoundly
modified this view of Galileo. Today, although the old Galileo lives on in many popular writings,
among historians of science a new and more sophisticated picture has emerged. At the same time our
sympathy for Galileo's opponents has grown somewhat. His telescopic observations are justly
immortal; they aroused great interest at the time, they had important theoretical consequences,
and they provided a striking demonstration of the potentialities hidden in instruments and
apparatus. But can we blame those who looked and failed to see what Galileo saw, if we remember
that to use a telescope at the limit of its powers calls for long experience and intimate
familiarity with one's instrument? Was the philosopher who refused to look through Galileo's
telescope more culpable than those who alleged that the spiral nebulae observed with Lord Rosse's
great telescope in the 1840s were scratches left by the grinder? We can perhaps forgive those who
said the moons of Jupiter were produced by Galileo's spyglass if we recall that in his day, as for
centuries before, curved glass was the popular contrivance for producing not truth but illusion,
untruth; and if a single curved glass would distort nature, how much more would a pair of them?
下一篇:练习30
声明:以上文章均为用户自行添加,仅供打字交流使用,不代表本站观点,本站不承担任何法律责任,特此声明!如果有侵犯到您的权利,请及时联系我们删除。
文章热度:★★☆☆☆
文章难度:★★★☆☆
文章质量:★★★☆☆
说明:系统根据文章的热度、难度、质量自动认证,已认证的文章将参与打字排名!
本文打字排名TOP20
登录后可见
用户更多文章推荐
- 新概念英语4 L33 Education2023-11-23
- 新概念英语4 L31 The sculptor speak...2023-03-23
- 新概念英语4 L30 Exploring the sea-...2023-03-22
- 新概念英语4 L29 The hovercraft2023-03-21
- 新概念英语4 L28 Patients and docto...2023-03-20
- 新概念英语4 L27 The 'Vasa'2023-03-19
- 新概念英语4 L26 The past life of t...2023-03-18
- 新概念英语4 L25 Non-auditory effec...2023-03-17
- 新概念英语4 L24 Beauty2023-03-16
- 新概念英语4 L23 Bird flight2023-03-15
- 新概念英语4 L22 Knowledge and pro...2023-03-12
- 新概念英语4 L212023-03-11
- 新概念英语4 L20 Snake poison2023-03-10
- 新概念英语4 L19 The stuff of dream...2023-03-10
- 新概念英语4 L18 Porpoises2023-03-09
- 新概念英语4 L17 A man-made disea...2023-03-06
- 新概念英语4 L16 The modern city2023-03-03
- 新概念英语4 L15 Secrecy in industr...2023-03-01
- 新概念英语4L14 The Butterfly Eff...2023-02-28
- 新概念英语4 L13 The search for oil2023-02-27